Welcome

OpenAI's new model could revolutionise corporate communications
August might be a quiet month for some newsletters, but not for us. And it's a good job as the much-hyped and trailed GPT-5 was launched last Thursday. I sat through the 90-minute live launch (despite it clashing with me cooking dinner as it started at 6pm UK time) so you didn't have to.
Is it exciting? Undoubtedly.
Is it better? Definitely.
Does it live up to the hype? It's a toss-up between maybe and wait and see.
In this issue, I share my first impressions and what it means for PR and comms professionals. Spoiler: it’s not just about smarter AI—it’s about unlocking new possibilities for proposals, planning, and productivity.
Imaging analysing 14,749 evening news broadcasts to identify more than 154,000 distinct stories to create a searchable index of 15 years of coverage. Then imagine doing it in just 39 minutes at a cost of $154. Read on to find out how a university did it.
We also dive into the murky waters of AI ethics and social licence. From Perplexity’s spat with Cloudflare to Trump Media’s filtered Truth Search AI, the battle over content, bias, and transparency is heating up. Meanwhile, the UK’s first virtual MP experiment raises tough questions about trust, privacy, and public perception—especially when innovation outpaces policy. These stories aren’t just tech curiosities; they’re signals of what comms leaders must prepare for as AI becomes embedded in stakeholder engagement.
And if you’re wondering how the big players are adapting, look no further than McKinsey’s 12,000 AI agents or Unilever’s Beauty AI Studio. From influencer receptions at Number 10 to Hertz’s flawed damage scanners, the case studies in this issue show the spectrum of success and missteps. Whether it’s predictive analytics, media monitoring, or AI-powered content creation, the message is clear: comms professionals must lead the charge—not just follow the tech.
A great example of how comms could be using AI is The Economist making its annual The World Ahead available on Google NotebookLM. Just imagine doing the same for your corporate announcements.
Read this edition and see why Google's AI head's claim that the AI Revolution will be 10 times bigger than the Industrial Revolution might just be true.
Finally if you want some light relief and a great example of creative corporate comms then watch Vattenfall's video with Samuel L Jackson. Yes, you read that right. Hollywood megastar Samuel L Jackson stars in the latest corporate video from a Swedish energy company.
Listen to AI podcast of this edition
You can listen to two AI presenters discussing this issue on the podcast.
It was created using Notebooks in Microsoft 365 Copilot. Note that it is unedited and contains small errors. Intriguingly it won't let me save the audio overview as it claims it contains 'sensitive' information. It doesn't.
News

GPT-5 – what does it mean for PR and communications?
The much hyped launch of OpenAI's new GPT-5 model has finally happened.
On Friday I spent half a day playing [I mean doing meaningful in-depth research 😀] and wrote up my first thoughts on what it means for the public relations, communications and corporate affairs profession.
The TL;DR is it opens up lots of things we can use it for. Many of these will be things we could partially use it for before. Used properly AI could assist with lots of tasks, but its assistance was limited. It was constrained by issues like being geeky enough to know which model to choose. It was constrained by a technical issue which meant it couldn't remember enough to do complex activities.
Since I wrote the article OpenAI's Sam Altman has revealed just how important it is that users no longer need to choose a model. The percentage of users using reasoning models (where AI 'thinks' before answering) was 1% for free users and 7% for paid Plus users. It's now 7% and 24% respectively. That means 99% of free users and 93% of paid users were using a fraction of AI's real power and potential!
AI power users are already grumbling, but who gives a.... because the key to success is overcoming the AI adoption illusion. Simply giving most people AI tools, won't unlock the huge potential. It's like giving everyone a high performance sports car when most don't even know how to drive.
Both of these have largely been solved by GPT-5. I've spent the weekend rewriting three new business proposals and one AI Opportunities Action Plan for a client because GPT-5 opens up new possibilities.
Read my full article on stuartbruce.biz. I'll do another once I've more chance to do in-depth research [play]. 😊
AI
Perplexity hits back at Cloudflare
Many proponents of protecting copyright for publishers were quick to praise Cloudflare for revealing how Perplexity 'steals' content by using underhand web crawlers to scrape publisher websites. The reveal was to publicise Cloudflare's new (paid) service to block AI crawlers. Now Perplexity has hit back with a long, detailed article about how Cloudflare's allegations misrepresent what it really does.
The TL;DR is Perplexity argues there is a fundamental difference between crude automated crawling and user-driven fetching.
Personally I think both Cloudflare and Perplexity are missing the bigger point. For society and the economy AI should have access to content to provide better answers. But it should pay for it. That's morally what I feel to be correct. The legal situation is far more complex as big tech slugs it out with publishers while politicians and government's struggle to understand and decide.
I believe for the benefit of society and the economy it needs the middle way of AI being allowed to use content for the good of all, but publishers and content creators being paid appropriately.
"It’ll be 10 times bigger than the Industrial Revolution – and maybe 10 times faster"
The AI future will be 10 times bigger than the Industrial Revolution is one of the quotes from this in-depth interview with Demis Hassabis, head of DeepMind, the UK company Google acquired to become its AI arm.
Trump Media launches Truth Search AI to provide filtered / censored answers
Trump Media just launched Truth Search AI—a search engine for its Truth Social network. It's powered by Perplexity. It might look like any other AI integration, but if you look closer it is providing its own selective version of the truth.
Truth Search AI has been deliberately engineered to only pull answers from right-leaning sources like Fox News, Newsmax, and Breitbart. This isn’t accidental. Perplexity is simply the tech company enabling Trump Media's manipulation of the answers.
It raises some interesting questions. Is Truth Social AI simply filtering answers to satisfy its customers by catering to their interests? Or the more sinister interpretation is it is censoring answers to prevent its customers from seeing the real truth, rather than Truth Social's version of the truth.
Perplexity can claim neutrality, but licensing tech without ethics has consequences.
The dominance of US and Chinese companies in the AI arms race is potentially a huge threat to other countries. The importance of sovereign AI has never been more important.
CommTech tools

Gaming Copilot available on Game Bar for Windows PC for Xbox Insiders
OK not really a CommTech story, but an example of how AI is both becoming far more capable and ubiquitous to help in far more places and ways. The new Gaming Copilot (Beta) is designed to help players sharpen skills and bypass obstacles. For now it's only available on Game Bar for Windows PC for Xbox Insiders enrolled in the PC Gaming Preview.
I'm currently replaying Red Dead Remption What's your favourite game?
Case studies
How McKinsey is adopting AI and what it means for consultants
The Wall Street Journal look at how the world's most prestigious management consultancy is adapting to use AI. McKinsey now has more than 12,000 AI agents its consultants use across an array of activities to do them faster and better.
Its AI uses include helping consultants to build PowerPoint decks, taking notes and summing up interviews, creating first drafts of research documents for clients. Another bot checks the logic of a consultant’s arguments, verifying their flow of reasoning makes sense.
Its most popular agent is the 'McKinsey tone of voice' that helps employees write in a classic style—language the firm describes as sharp, concise and clear.
All of these use cases are ones that can be adopted by PR agencies and in-house communications teams (and that we're helping them to do). The critical steps are: identifying the initial tasks and use cases, choosing and implementing AI tools, developing team bots, agents and prompts, and wide-spread training to ensure effective AI adoption.

Number 10 invites the influencers
A mainly positive, but slightly sniffy piece in the FT on Labour hosting its first Downing Street reception for between 70 and 90 'content creators' or 'influencers'.
It's a good example of why influencers aren't just for brands, but can be just as relevant to corporate communications. The FT quotes the 2025 Reuters Digital News Report and reports that in Britain, the share of people getting their news from social media at least sometimes has risen to 39%.
Mainstream media no longer cuts it, for any stakeholders.
Picture from the Instagram account of Love Island star turned revenge-porn campaigner Georgia Harrison. It shows how well planned the event was as presumably the sculpture of a twisted red telephone box was placed outside Number 10 for the event to help create Insta ready moments.
Unilever has built an AI studio to create content in-house
A case study looking at how Unilever has "been building a generative AI assembly line for its digital creative."
For the last year Uniever has been building the Beauty AI Studio: a bespoke, in-house system for its beauty and wellbeing business. It is now being used in 18 markets, including the UK and USA, to make content for paid social, programmatic display ads and e-commerce use across brands such as Dove Intensive Repair, TRESemme Lamellar Shine and Vaseline Gluta Hya.

MP creates an AI version of himself as the UK's ‘first virtual MP’
You might have seen the stories about the Labour MP who has unveiled what he says is the UK’s ‘first virtual MP’. It's fair to say it has had a mixed reaction. It has been discussed on many of the multiple PR, public affairs, politics and policy groups I participate in. Try the AI Mark Sewards here.
I've had several people contact me privately to ask for my thoughts. It's a hard one to comment on as Mark is a personal friend. I know his family. I campaigned for his election. My wife is a councillor in his constituency. I've stood to be a councillor in a different ward in his constituency. I didn't advise him and didn't know the company behind it was based near me until this story.
My honest take is the idea and concept is brilliant. Using AI to assist with dealing with simple daily queries and questions from constituents is a great use case for AI. Personalising it with a clone of Mark's voice makes it even more useful. Finally, he did it for the best of reasons - to support a start-up business in his constituency, to show how a local MP can innovate and experiment, and to to provide a better service to his constituents.
The most interesting aspect of this is the start-up Neural Voice is focused on voice which means beyond this interesting experiment its technology has lots of potentially practical uses. The examples on its website include being able to make telephone calls to a sales assistant, customer support representative, recruitment assistant and travel consultant.
Most AI personas focus on chat or video. Utilising voice and focusing on telephone calls opens it up to different use cases.
But, you can probably sense a but coming on.
It could and should have been done in a different way. The backlash was inevitable and predictable. It couldn't have been avoided. It could have been massively mitigated. There are lots of complex issues to be navigated around social licence, transparency, trust, ethics, privacy, security, hallucination, risk, disinformation and more.
All of these should have been both considered and critically explained publicly as part of the launch.
If you don't have time to experiment with AI Mark you can watch this short video where Northern Agenda editor Rob Parsons puts it through its paces... with mixed results. It's evident from Rob's test that the experiment was probably launched a little hastily as its answers show it is lacking training data in its knowledge base that could have made it more powerful, without compromising privacy or security.
The issues raised by the AI MP experiement is why we invest time in developing plans and policies for clients. The purpose is to ensure innovation that delivers practical results in a safe, ethical way.
We've been exploring similar ideas for clients and prospects, but need to ensure the correct plans, policies and safety is in place before doing anything public.
Swedish PM criticised for using AI
After the AI MP another example of the necessity of social licence for AI is criticism of the Swedish PM for using AI as a sounding board.
Ulf Kristersson told the Swedish business newspaper Dagens industri: “I use it myself quite often. If for nothing else than for a second opinion. What have others done? And should we think the complete opposite? Those types of questions.”
It's similar to the flack directed at UK cabinet minister Peter Kyle for using AI. My comment was I'd be more shocked if the minister responsible for AI policy wasn't using AI.
All of these examples show how critical it is to understand social licence for AI and always have the right policies and processes in place.

Explore The Economist's annual The World Ahead using AI
The Economist has made the 70 articles and analyses in its annual The World Ahead available in Google NotebookLM.
Not only can you read the articles and analyses but you can also study them with all the usual NotebookLM functions: You can create an AI-generated podcast, read it as a FAQ, view it as a mindmap, create a study guide. Or just ask it questions.
It's a great example of making content more accessible to stakeholders. Corporate comms can upload and share their own content such as annual reports, research and white papers, ESG or DEI reports and more.
Instead of forcing stakeholders into your straitjacket you create a user experience they can personalise to their own needs.
We need more corporate comms videos like this
Are you bold, innovative and effective? Vattenfall's corporate comms team clearly is. It teamed up with Samuel L Jackson to create this knock-out video will a killer script. And yes, Mr Jackson drops the F bomb.
The climate emergency is real, but solving it requires massive disruption to peoples' lives. We all have to stop fearing and starting embracing nuclear energy. We all have to accept the inevitability of unpopular wind farms dominating our landscape. I say unpopular because while wind farms are popular with people using their green energy, they tend not to be with the people who live where wind farms are built.
If we are to change minds so people accept these changes, we need bold, innovative communications like this. I'm not privy to the data, so can't comment on its effectiveness, but I'd put money on it working better than a bland, factual defence of wind farms.

Hertz's AI system that scans for damage on rental cars dings innocent people
Who would have guessed that an AI system to check for damage on rental cars would make mistakes and penalise innocent customers? Anyone with a modicum of common sense?
Hertz is facing criticism because an AI system to check rental cars for damage is flagging false positives and penalises customers for damage that doesn't exist.
This is a good example of why corporate comms should always be in the loop when companies implement any AI. It's why we keep stressing the importance of social licence and ensuring AI is implemented in ways that win the trust of stakeholders such as customers and employees.
Apparently, Hertz failed to do this and is now feeling the heat?
Is your corporate affairs team always in the loop on how your company uses AI?
📺 AI indexes 15 years of TV news in under an hour
Monitoring text and even images is easy, but video has always been more challenging. Google's Gemini 2.5 Flash has a near-human ability to watch video and analyse what it's about.
The GDELT Project at Vanderbilt University used Gemini 2.5 Flash Thinking to process 14,749 evening news broadcasts from three major US networks, identifying more than 154,000 distinct stories. Each story was tagged with geolocation, sentiment, framing, and narrative data—creating a searchable index of 15 years of coverage. The entire process took just 39 minutes and cost $154 in AI tokens, showing how AI can scale tasks that previously required decades of manual effort.
This has huge implications for media monitoring and analysis.What's remarkable is that no data was used to train, tune or otherwise contribute to any model. It used the standard off-the-shelf ability of Gemini 2.5 Flash Thinking.
It shows how AI can move beyond keyword search to story-level analysis. For communications professionals, it offers a new way to track media narratives, assess sentiment, and understand how stories are framed over time.
It creates a huge challenge for tradtiional media monitoring, analysis and monitoring companies as what was previously complex and expensive can now be achieved in-house.
CommTech newswatch
NewsWhip acquired by Sprout Social
The big CommTech news is that Dublin-based predictive analytics company, NewsWhip, has been acquired by Sprout Social. NewsWhip is used by publishers and the corporate communications industry to predict the virality and growth of social media posts and news stories and to identify trends before they emerge.
It has a multitude of uses in both publishing and public relations. You can use it to help identify trending news themes and topics so you can pre-newsjack and create stories before the trend breaks to capitalise on it more effectively than newsjacking it afterwards by jumping on an existing trend. For crisis communications it helps you to make that all important decision of ignore or respond based on hard data, not just instinct and experience.
UK government spends £2bn on Microsoft licences
The UK government has released figures to show that its total annual investment in Microsoft products and services is projected to be about £1.9 billion
The government has a five year deal managed through the Crown Commercial Service. This is for the entire public sector including central government, schools, hospitals, councils and emergency services. It covers the full range of Microsoft products and services including Microsoft 365, Azure, Business Applications, and Copilot AI tools.